Is it possible for ChatGPT to offer more personalized responses to math inquiries and doubts?
For now, the answer is obviously not.
While ChatGPT can “understand” mathematics on a surface level, it cannot converse with mathematical rigor. It is incapable of resolving mathematical misunderstandings, and it frequently adds new ones.
Furthermore, it frequently makes mathematical blunders that are impossible for a simple spreadsheet or calculator to produce.
For what purpose does ChatGPT exist?
It’s just a bunch of rambling that fills the screen with text that can seem convincing at times but isn’t trustworthy overall. ChatGPT frequently errs but is never in question. It mimics the behavior of an expert and can even pass for one at times. However, it is typically some sort of b.s. artist, who combines truth, error, and invention into a coherent whole that, if you don’t know any better, can sound convincing.
A tool like this has restricted potential for use in the classroom. Internet forums are full of educators debating the merits of using ChatGPT to conduct;
- Online tutoring sessions
- Create lesson plans
- Makeup test questions
They have to be very careful.
ChatGPT can provide mountains of basic content, some of which is beneficial;
but, teachers should check all knowledge before giving it to pupils.
A sense of disappointment washed over me, but perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised by the outcome.
After all, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman tweeted on December 10 that relying on ChatGPT for anything crucial is premature because of its “robustness and veracity” issues. Some professionals have even said that ChatGPT “lies” or “hallucinates” on occasion. On the chat interface, it says that ChatGPT “may occasionally generate false information.” In terms of geometry or what Google Translate can do, this is a massive understatement.
These issues might be temporary and resolved in a future release, or they might stick around for quite some time.
Since OpenAI published ChatGPT in its current state, it’s safe to assume that the issues it has may not have a simple solution, despite the fact that it is staffed by roughly 250 incredibly brilliant people.
In the not-too-distant future, we may have an intelligent programs that can tutor students in specific subjects;
- Programs that can converse in natural language;
- Programs that can draw on deep and accurate representations of subjects like geometry
- Programs that can recognize and correct the common missteps and misconceptions that lead to wrong answers
However, that point is not now within our reach. The geometry capabilities of Wolfram Alpha and the error tracing capabilities of Mathia and CTAT are examples of current tools in this area.
Yet these programs rely on explicit subject-specific programming and are unable to engage in natural language conversation. While ChatGPT and other AI tools are conversant in natural language, they seem to struggle with geometry and other fundamental academic disciplines.
ChatGPT has some issues, however, it is accessible to the public and used by certain students and educators. Not everyone will be cautious when using it. Perhaps we haven’t thought through the repercussions.
Related Article : What is the point of an artificial intelligence chatbot?
